LetsLease car leasing deals from an independent UK broker

Peugeot 3008 vs Renault Austral vs Nissan Qashqai: Three Different Hybrids

These three come up together because they are the same size, the same money and all three are sold as hybrids. That last part is where the comparison usually goes wrong, because they are three genuinely different kinds of hybrid and only one of the three has a plug.

There is also a safety trap in here that almost nothing online handles properly. The Nissan Qashqai currently has two live Euro NCAP ratings on the same generation of car, one with five stars and one with four. Everything below comes from each manufacturer's own UK price guides and specification pages, gov.uk's own grant list and Euro NCAP's own assessment documents.

Peugeot 3008

The only one with a plug

PowertrainsHybrid, plug in, electric
Boot, base588 litres, unlabelled
Euro NCAP4 stars, 2025
GrantBand 2 on the E-3008

Renault Austral

Full hybrid only

PowertrainsOne, 200hp full hybrid
Boot, base527 or 657 litres
Euro NCAP5 stars, 2022, tested on another car
Braked towing1,500kg

Nissan Qashqai

Two ratings, neither plugs in

PowertrainsMild hybrid or e-POWER
Boot, base479 litres, seats up
Euro NCAP5 stars 2021 and 4 stars 2025
Braked towing1,830kg on the automatic

These Are Not Three Versions Of The Same Idea

The word hybrid is doing a lot of work across these three cars, and it is hiding three different engineering answers. This matters because it changes what the published economy figures actually mean.

What it actually is
Peugeot 3008A 48 volt self charging hybrid, a plug in hybrid, or one of three fully electric E-3008s
Renault AustralA conventional full hybrid, and nothing else in the current UK range
Nissan QashqaiA mild hybrid where the engine drives the wheels, or e-POWER where it never does
The Nissan e-POWER is the one that is genuinely different, and Nissan explains it well

In e-POWER the petrol engine is not connected to the wheels at all. It runs as a generator, charging a 2.1 kWh battery, and an electric motor drives the car. Nissan's own description is a combination of petrol engine which charges the battery and an electric motor that turns wheels. So it drives like an electric car and it is fuelled like a petrol one, and it never needs plugging in. That is a real and underrated proposition if you want the electric driving feel without changing anything about how you refuel.

The Austral is full hybrid only now, and plenty of older content still says otherwise

Renault's own UK price guide, with prices valid from 3 November 2026, lists three Austral versions and every one of them is an E-Tech self charging full hybrid at 200hp. There is no mild hybrid, no TCe petrol and no diesel in the current UK range. The mild hybrid in particular has been dropped, and a lot of comparison content, including the brief we started this article from, still describes the Austral as offering both. If you have seen an Austral mild hybrid quoted, it is not a current car.

The practical consequence is that comparing combined mpg across these three is comparing three incompatible things. The Peugeot plug in hybrid's figure is produced by a test that assumes a significant amount of electric running, so it flatters a car that is only charged occasionally. The Renault's figure is a conventional full hybrid number and is the closest of the three to something you would recognise in use. The Nissan e-POWER's figure comes from a petrol engine working as a generator, which behaves differently again, particularly at steady motorway speed where a series hybrid has no mechanical path to the wheels to fall back on.

And one practical point that removes a whole category of question. Neither the Austral nor the Qashqai has a plug, in any version. So there is no charging time to compare, no wallbox to install and no three phase supply question for either of them. Only the Peugeot raises any of that.

The Qashqai Has Two Live Euro NCAP Ratings, And That Is The Biggest Trap Here

This is the single most important thing in this comparison and it is handled badly almost everywhere. Nissan's current generation Qashqai has been tested twice, four years apart, and both assessments are live.

The 2021 assessment The 2025 assessment
StarsFiveFour
Published8 December 202119 November 2025
Tested variantQashqai 1.3 petrol 4x2 AcentaQashqai 1.5 N-Connecta, e-POWER hybrid
Kerb weight tested1,503kg1,629kg
Adult occupant91%78%
Child occupant91%85%
Vulnerable road users70%65%
Safety assist95%62%
Extra tagBest in ClassNone
Runs until31 December 202731 December 2031
The five star rating is the older one, and it is the one that expires soon

On Euro NCAP's six year convention the 2021 five star rating lapses at the end of December 2027, which is around thirteen months away. The 2025 four star rating runs to the end of 2031. So the Qashqai's headline safety position is about to change, not because the car has changed but because the five star result is aging out and the four star result is the one that will remain. If you are taking a four year agreement starting now, the rating that covers most of your term is the four star one.

The scores look like the car got worse and it did not. Euro NCAP's protocols got considerably harder between 2021 and 2025, and the 2025 test was run on the heavier e-POWER version. The same thing happens across the industry. What it does mean is that quoting the Qashqai as a five star car today is only half the story, and quoting it as a four star car is also only half.

Which rating covers your car depends on its vehicle identification number

The 2025 datasheet states the VIN from which the newer rating applies, which is J122203750. Both assessments list covered variants in left and right hand drive, with the 2021 rating covering the 1.5 petrol hybrid and the 1.3 petrol in two and four wheel drive, and the 2025 rating covering the 1.3 petrol in both drives plus the 1.5 e-POWER that was tested. So the honest answer to what rating does a Qashqai have is that it depends which Qashqai, and we can check that against the actual vehicle on a quote.

Two small curiosities worth knowing because they show how messy this is. Euro NCAP's own record of the body type changed from five door hatchback in 2021 to five door SUV in 2025 for what is the same car. And the 2025 covered variants list includes a 1.3 petrol four wheel drive version that Nissan's current UK price and specification table does not offer, although its older mobile site, which is still live, does.

The Austral's Five Stars Were Earned By A Car The UK Never Got

The Austral's rating is the strongest looking of the three on paper and it needs the most context, because the car Euro NCAP crashed is not the car Renault sells here.

What Euro NCAP published Detail
StarsFive
Published16 November 2022
Variant testedRenault Austral 1.3 TCe, left hand drive, 103kW
Body type recordedMPV
Kerb weight tested1,502kg
Adult occupant88%
Child occupant83%
Vulnerable road users69%
Safety assist87%
A 1.3 TCe petrol in left hand drive, and the UK only gets a full hybrid

The tested car was a 1.3 litre turbo petrol producing 103kW, which has never been part of the UK Austral range, in left hand drive. The UK E-Tech full hybrid is brought under the rating by vehicle identification number rather than by having been tested itself. That is a normal and accepted way for Euro NCAP to extend a rating, and it is not a criticism of the car. But a five star result earned by a lighter, differently powered, left hand drive version is a weaker piece of evidence about the car you would actually lease than the number alone suggests.

There is a second Euro NCAP page for the Austral and it is not a safety rating

Euro NCAP also publishes an Assisted Driving grading for the Austral, graded Very Good for its Active Driver Assist system in June 2023, with Driver Engagement 80.8%, Vehicle Assistance 77.3%, Assistance Competence 77% and Safety Backup 92%. That is a completely separate programme assessing how well the driver assistance works, not how the car performs in a crash. The two get conflated regularly, and you will see the Very Good grading quoted as though it were part of the safety rating.

Put the three cars' ratings side by side honestly and the picture is less clear cut than any single table would suggest. The Peugeot's four stars were awarded in 2025 under the current protocol on the car it actually sells. The Renault's five stars were awarded in 2022 on a version the UK never received. The Nissan has both a 2021 five star result that is expiring and a 2025 four star result that is not. A reader who concludes the Renault is the safest of the three because it has the most stars has been misled by the way the data is presented rather than by anyone lying to them.

Three Boots, And Nissan Publishes A State The Others Do Not

All three measure differently, label differently and in two cases publish more than one answer. These are each manufacturer's own figures and labels.

Peugeot 3008

Version Base Rear seats folded
Hybrid 145 and Plug-in Hybrid 225588 litres1,663 litres
E-3008 Electric 210 and 230588 litres1,663 litres
E-3008 Electric 325 Dual Motor544 litres1,619 litres

Peugeot's 588 litre figure carries no seats up label at all, and no reference to the measurement standard on any current page. Only the folded figure is labelled. Interestingly Peugeot's older price lists did use explicit standardised labels for minimum and maximum boot volume, and it has dropped that labelling on the current car.

Renault Austral

What Renault publishes Figure
Minimum boot volume527 litres
With the rear bench slid forwards657 litres
Maximum boot volume, specification page1,525 litres
With rear seats folded down, brochure1,736 litres

So Renault publishes two different maxima in two different documents, 1,525 litres on its specification page and 1,736 litres in its brochure, and it does not reconcile them. Its 657 litre figure is achieved by sliding the rear bench forward, which costs rear legroom, so it is not comparable with a fixed seats up figure from either rival.

Nissan Qashqai

What Nissan publishes, with its own labels Mild hybrid e-POWER
Seats up, no parcel shelf479 litres479 litres
Seats down, up to waistline910 litres890 litres
Seats down, to roof1,422 litres1,415 litres
Tekna+ on 20 inch wheels, seats up455 litres455 litres
Nissan is the only one of the three that tells you what it has excluded, and the only one publishing a waistline figure

Its seats up label specifies that the parcel shelf is not included, which no rival states either way. And it publishes two distinct folded figures on two explicit bases, loaded to the waistline and loaded to the roof. Almost nobody else in this segment publishes a waistline figure at all. Setting Peugeot's 1,663 litres against Nissan's 1,422 therefore makes the Nissan look much smaller than it is, because 1,422 is Nissan's to the roof figure and Peugeot has not said what basis its 1,663 uses. As a small aside, Nissan's own label contains the typo parce shelf, which we have reproduced as printed.

The honest conclusion is the same as on boot figures generally in this segment. These three numbers cannot be ranked against each other. If boot space is what your decision rests on, tell us the load you actually need to carry and we will get the right figure confirmed from the funder's specification for the exact version you are considering.

Towing, And The One Figure We Are Not Going To Print

Towing is the clearest win in this comparison, and it is also where we have to leave a gap.

Braked Unbraked
Peugeot 3008 and E-3008Not publishedNot published
Renault Austral1,500kg, driver only750kg, driver only
Nissan Qashqai mild hybrid manual1,680kg700kg
Nissan Qashqai mild hybrid automatic1,830kg725kg
Nissan Qashqai e-POWERSee the note belowSee the note below
We are not publishing the e-POWER towing figure, and here is exactly why

Two separate reads of the same Nissan UK specification table disagreed about which column the e-POWER values belong to. The row labels are certain, the values are not. On top of that, the candidate figures are 770kg braked against 750kg unbraked, and a near identical braked and unbraked pair is normally the signature of placeholder data rather than a real specification. Here that pair appears on Nissan's own UK page rather than in a third party feed, which makes it harder to dismiss and harder to trust. Nissan publishes no towing figures anywhere else we could reach, and the brochure route is behind a form requesting personal details, so we did not take it.

What we can say is that if you tow, the Qashqai mild hybrid automatic is the strongest of the three at 1,830kg braked, and the Peugeot is the weakest because Peugeot publishes nothing at all for the current car. Peugeot's previous generation price lists did publish a braked figure of 1,250kg for the hybrid and plug in hybrid, and never published an unbraked figure at any point, which tells you something about how long this gap has existed.

Renault's figures carry a qualifier neither rival uses

Renault's row labels read maximum towing weight braked and unbraked, driver only. That means the figures assume nobody else is in the car. Nissan's labels carry no load qualifier at all. So the Renault 1,500kg and the Nissan 1,680kg are not quite measuring the same situation, and the Renault figure is the more conservatively stated of the two. Renault also publishes it for the entry version only and not per trim for the two higher cars.

If towing matters, this is the figure we would get confirmed in writing from the funder's specification before you order, and on the e-POWER in particular we would insist on it.

The Grant Only Reaches One Of These Three

Only the Peugeot can qualify for the Electric Car Grant, and only in its fully electric E-3008 form. Here is the position as gov.uk states it.

Electric Car Grant position
Peugeot E-3008Band 2, up to £1,500
Peugeot 3008 Hybrid and Plug-in HybridNot eligible, they burn fuel at the tailpipe
Renault AustralNot eligible by design
Nissan Qashqai, both powertrainsNot eligible by design

The scheme requires zero grams of CO2 per kilometre at the tailpipe, so a full hybrid and a series hybrid are both excluded no matter how efficient they are. That is a rule about the technology rather than a judgement about the car.

The cap is £37,000, not £42,000, and the difference matters

gov.uk states that the grant will only apply to vehicles priced at or below £37,000. A further £5,000 of flexibility is allowed for optional extras where the base vehicle is already priced below that, which is where the 42,000 figure you may have seen comes from. So 42,000 is the ceiling for a fully optioned qualifying car, not the cap itself. There are two bands, £3,750 and £1,500, and there is no 2,500 pound band despite how often one is quoted.

There is a tension on the E-3008's eligibility that we cannot resolve

Peugeot's own release of 28 May 2026 says the E-3008 Electric 210 now meets the eligibility criteria for the 1,500 pound grant across all trim levels, naming Allure, Allure Premium and GT. But every current E-3008 price we could reach is £45,950 or above, which is well over the 37,000 cap. For both of those to be true, Peugeot must have repriced the 210 below the cap, and we could not verify the new figure because Peugeot UK publishes no retail price list we could reach. We are reporting both facts rather than guessing which one has moved.

The other eligibility conditions are worth knowing because they are not all about price. The car has to be a passenger vehicle, produce no tailpipe CO2, have a minimum battery range of 100 miles, carry at least a three year or 60,000 mile vehicle warranty and an eight year or 100,000 mile battery warranty, and meet minimum sustainability criteria. The seller applies the discount, so you do not apply for anything. The scheme opened in July 2025 and is due to close at the end of March 2030, and the grant amounts can change while it runs.

Prices, And The Price Lists That Describe The Wrong Car

Pricing is the weakest published area across all three, and for different reasons in each case.

What we could confirm
Renault Austral£35,695 to £38,995, from Renault's November 2026 price guide, orders until 31 December 2026
Nissan Qashqai mild hybridFrom £31,145, rising to 41,135 on the top grade
Nissan Qashqai e-POWERNot published on Nissan's current pages
Peugeot 3008Current retail prices not reachable, entry around 34,945 from a May 2026 release
Peugeot's own old price list PDFs are still live and cover the previous generation car

There are two Peugeot 3008 price and specification guides still downloadable, one dated 1 April 2024 and one dated 1 August 2023, and both describe the previous generation car with its PureTech 130 petrol, BlueHDi 130 diesel and HYBRID4 300. The 2024 one is marked stock only. The business guide is older still, dated July 2022. So anyone who searches for the Peugeot 3008 price list and downloads what they find gets a car Peugeot no longer sells. Peugeot's current prices sit behind a third party price list service we could not reach, which is why there is no current Peugeot price table on this page.

Two naming problems on Nissan's own pricing page

Nissan's first price card is labelled Acenta while its own footnote says the price is based on an Acenta Premium. And its top card, at £41,135, is described only as the top tier model and given no grade name at all, although Nissan's price and specification table elsewhere calls that grade Tekna+. For e-POWER prices, the only manufacturer source we found was Nissan GB's own news site dated 28 August 2025, which is more than a year old and probably superseded, so we have not tabled those figures as current.

One thing worth saying about all of this. List prices are a poor guide to what these three cost to lease, because funders price them differently and the gaps between them on a rental rarely match the gaps on paper. The Austral is the only one of the three with a current, dated, complete manufacturer price guide, which makes it the easiest to check and does not make it the best value.

Economy Figures, And Why Nissan Publishes Three Different Sets

We said earlier that comparing combined mpg across these three compares three different things. There is a second problem on top of that, which is that one of the three publishes several answers.

Nissan source e-POWER Mild hybrid
Current price and specifications page65.7 mpg and 98 g/km on the entry grade44.8 mpg manual, 45.6 automatic
Powertrain comparison page62.8 to 64.2 mpg and 100 to 103 g/km44.1 to 45.6 mpg
Legacy mobile site, still live53.3 to 54.3 mpg and 117 to 119 g/kmIncludes grades and engines no longer sold
Nissan GB news site, August 202562.8 mpg and 102 g/kmNot covered
The legacy site is the one to watch, and it is still live

Nissan's older mobile site still publishes a Qashqai specification table that includes a Visia grade, a DIG-T 140 engine and four wheel drive versions the current desktop site no longer lists, together with an e-POWER economy figure more than ten mpg below the current one. It is Nissan's own site, so it looks authoritative, and it describes a range Nissan has moved on from. If you are checking a Qashqai figure and it does not match ours, that is the likeliest explanation.

Renault's economy row is not a WLTP range at all

Renault's label reads Configured MPG Combined, giving 58.9 mpg, and Configured CO2 Combined, giving 108 g/km, with the test method named as WLTP. A configured figure is for one specific build rather than a range across the range, which is a different thing from the spread of figures Peugeot and Nissan publish. There is no row on Renault's guide labelled simply WLTP economy. The Austral's drivetrain is also worth a look for its own sake: a 1,199cc three cylinder turbo petrol with a 2 kWh battery and a gearbox Renault describes as a four speed with two additional motors.

Lined up loosely and with all those caveats attached, the lowest tailpipe CO2 among the fuel burning versions goes to the Nissan e-POWER at 98 g/km on Nissan's current page, then the Renault at 107, then the Peugeot hybrid at 124. The Peugeot plug in hybrid's 57 g/km and the E-3008's zero are produced by completely different test assumptions and should not be read as being on the same scale. If company car tax is the reason you are asking, note that the bands and rates change each tax year, so the figure on the funder's specification at the time you order is the one that will actually apply to you.

Warranty

Two of the three are straightforward. The third contradicts itself.

Vehicle warranty Battery warranty
Peugeot 3008Two Peugeot answers, both totalling 8 years8 years or 100,000 miles
Renault Austral3 years or 60,000 milesNot published
Nissan Qashqai3 years or 60,000 milesNot published
Peugeot's own page gives two different splits of the same eight years

The body text of Peugeot's electric page says its care package consists of two years standard manufacturer's warranty plus up to six years of special coverage. The footnote on the same page says three years standard plus up to five years of special coverage. Both add up to eight years, but the split between the standard warranty and the extended coverage is not the same thing at all, because the conditions attached to each part differ. Peugeot does not reconcile them. The battery cover of eight years or 100,000 miles is stated consistently.

On the Austral and the Qashqai, neither Renault nor Nissan publishes a separate traction battery warranty for its hybrid system that we could reach. Both have small batteries, 2 kWh in the Austral and 2.1 kWh in the Qashqai e-POWER, so the exposure is far smaller than on a full electric car. It is still worth having confirmed in writing, and we will ask for it as part of a quote.

So Which One Should You Lease

These three suit genuinely different people, which is unusual for cars this similar on the outside.

If this is your priority The honest answer
You want to go fully electric eventuallyThe Peugeot, the only one offering a plug in hybrid and three electric versions
You want a grantThe E-3008, Band 2, and the only one of the three that can qualify
You towThe Qashqai mild hybrid automatic at 1,830kg braked
You want electric driving without chargingThe Qashqai e-POWER, which no rival here matches
You want the simplest decisionThe Austral, one powertrain and one current price guide
You want the biggest boot on a stated basisThe Qashqai, because it is the only one that explains its own figures
You want current, in date safety data on the car you are buyingThe Peugeot, tested in 2025 on the version it sells

Our own pages go through each in more detail, and they are the Peugeot 3008, the Renault Austral and the Nissan Qashqai. If none of the three is quite right, the Kia Sportage, the Hyundai Tucson and the Skoda Kodiaq are the obvious alternatives at the same size and money, and we can put any of them into the same comparison.

The Peugeot is the only one of the three that lets you choose how electric you want to be, from a mild 48 volt system all the way to a 97 kWh Long Range electric car, and it is the only one that was crash tested in 2025 on the version it actually sells. Against that, Peugeot publishes the least usable information of the three: no current retail price list we could reach, no towing figures at all, an unlabelled boot figure and two different warranty splits on one page.

The Austral is the easy one to recommend to somebody who does not want to think about any of this. One powertrain, one current price guide with real prices and a stated order window, and a five star rating. The things to know are that the five stars were earned by a left hand drive petrol version the UK never got, and that its two published boot maxima differ by over 200 litres depending on which Renault document you read.

The Qashqai is the most interesting of the three and the most misrepresented. The e-POWER drivetrain genuinely has no equivalent here, it tows the most of any of these cars in mild hybrid automatic form, and it is the only one of the three that labels its boot figures properly enough to be checkable. Its safety position needs stating carefully rather than simplifying: there are two live ratings, the five star one expires at the end of 2027, and which applies to a given car depends on its vehicle identification number.

We can price all three on the same term and the same mileage, which is the only way to see what the differences actually cost. Tell us whether you tow, whether you can charge at home and whether you need a grant, and that usually narrows it to one.

Compare the 3008, Austral and Qashqai properly

Tell us your term, your mileage and whether you tow or can charge at home, and we will price all three across our funders so the real difference is visible.

Talk to LetsLease

Frequently Asked Questions

They use three different approaches. The Peugeot 3008 offers a 48 volt self charging hybrid, a plug in hybrid and three fully electric E-3008 versions, so it is the only one of the three with a plug. The Renault Austral is a conventional full hybrid and nothing else in the current UK range. The Nissan Qashqai offers a mild hybrid where the petrol engine drives the wheels, and e-POWER, where the engine never drives the wheels at all and works purely as a generator for an electric motor.

No, and that is the point of it. The petrol engine runs as a generator, charging a 2.1 kWh battery, and an electric motor drives the car. So it drives much like an electric car but you refuel it with petrol exactly as you would any other car. There is no plug, no wallbox and no charging time. If you want the electric driving experience without changing anything about how you refuel, it is the only car of these three that offers it.

Not any more in the UK. Renault's own price guide, with prices valid from 3 November 2026, lists three Austral versions and all three are E-Tech self charging full hybrids at 200hp. There is no mild hybrid, no TCe petrol and no diesel in the current range. A lot of comparison content still describes the Austral as offering a mild hybrid, so if you have seen one quoted, it is not a car you can currently order.

Two, and both are live on the same generation of car. The 2021 assessment gave it five stars with a Best in Class tag, tested on a 1.3 petrol. The 2025 assessment gave it four stars, tested on the heavier 1.5 e-POWER hybrid. The scores are 91%, 91%, 70% and 95% in 2021 against 78%, 85%, 65% and 62% in 2025 for adult occupant, child occupant, vulnerable road users and safety assist.

Both answers are currently true, which is why this is the trickiest thing in this comparison. Which rating applies to a particular car depends on its vehicle identification number, and the 2025 datasheet gives J122203750 as the point from which the newer rating applies. The important practical point is that the five star 2021 rating lapses at the end of December 2027 on Euro NCAP's usual six year convention, while the four star 2025 rating runs to the end of 2031. So on a four year agreement starting now, the four star rating covers most of your term.

No. Euro NCAP's protocols got significantly harder over that period, and the 2025 test was carried out on the heavier e-POWER version rather than the lighter 1.3 petrol used in 2021. The same pattern shows up across the industry whenever a car is retested under a newer protocol. It does mean that describing the Qashqai simply as a five star car today tells only half the story, and describing it as a four star car tells the other half.

That is harder to answer than the star counts suggest, and we would be careful about ranking them. The Peugeot's four stars were awarded in 2025 under the current protocol on the version it actually sells. The Renault's five stars were awarded in 2022 on a 1.3 TCe petrol in left hand drive that the UK never received, with the UK hybrid brought under the rating by vehicle identification number. The Nissan has two live ratings from different protocol years. Star counts from different years are not directly comparable.

Five stars, published on 16 November 2022, with 88% for adult occupant protection, 83% child occupant, 69% vulnerable road users and 87% safety assist. The detail worth knowing is the tested variant: a Renault Austral 1.3 TCe petrol producing 103kW, in left hand drive, with the body type recorded as MPV. That version has never been part of the UK range, so the UK full hybrid is covered by vehicle identification number rather than by having been tested itself.

The Nissan Qashqai mild hybrid automatic is the strongest at 1,830kg braked and 725kg unbraked, with the manual at 1,680kg and 700kg. The Renault Austral gives 1,500kg braked and 750kg unbraked, with its own labels specifying driver only, so those figures assume nobody else is in the car. Peugeot publishes no towing figure at all for the current 3008 or E-3008, braked or unbraked. We have deliberately not published a figure for the Qashqai e-POWER, and the article explains why.

Because we could not establish it reliably. Two separate reads of the same Nissan specification table disagreed about which column the e-POWER values sit in, so while the row labels are certain, the values are not. The candidate figures are also 770kg braked against 750kg unbraked, and a near identical pair like that is normally a sign of placeholder data rather than a real specification, although here it appears on Nissan's own page. If you tow and you want the e-POWER, we would get that confirmed in writing from the funder's specification first.

Only the fully electric Peugeot E-3008, in Band 2 at up to £1,500. The 3008 hybrid and plug in hybrid do not qualify because the scheme requires zero CO2 at the tailpipe, and the Renault Austral and Nissan Qashqai are both ineligible by design for the same reason. The cap is £37,000, with a further £5,000 of flexibility for optional extras on a car that already starts below that, and there are only two bands, £3,750 and £1,500.

There is a tension we could not resolve. Peugeot's own release of 28 May 2026 says the E-3008 Electric 210 meets the eligibility criteria for the 1,500 pound grant across all trim levels. But every current E-3008 price we could reach is £45,950 or above, which is well over the 37,000 pound cap. For both statements to hold, Peugeot must have repriced the 210 below the cap, and we could not verify the new figure because Peugeot UK publishes no retail price list we could reach. We would confirm the actual position on a quote.

They cannot be lined up fairly. Peugeot gives 588 litres with no seats up label and 1,663 litres folded. Renault gives 527 litres minimum, 657 with the rear bench slid forward, and then two different maxima depending on the document, 1,525 litres on its specification page and 1,736 in its brochure. Nissan gives 479 litres seats up excluding the parcel shelf, 910 litres folded to the waistline and 1,422 litres folded to the roof. Nissan is the only one of the three that states the basis of its own figures.

We do not know, but there are at least three current Nissan UK sources and they disagree. Its price and specifications page gives the e-POWER 65.7 mpg and 98 g/km on the entry grade, its powertrain comparison page gives 62.8 to 64.2 mpg and 100 to 103 g/km, and its older mobile site, which is still live, gives 53.3 to 54.3 mpg and 117 to 119 g/km along with grades and engines Nissan no longer sells. That legacy site is the likeliest reason you will find a Qashqai figure that does not match ours.

LetsLease is a credit broker rather than the lender. We arrange the agreement and place it with a funder such as Lex Autolease, Novuna, Ayvens or Santander, and that funder owns the vehicle and holds the agreement with you. Because we work across several funders rather than one, we can compare how each prices the same car.